Re: [Amc-list] 232 combustion chamber
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] 232 combustion chamber
- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2008 11:07:44 -0700
Bruce Hevner wrote:
> What is your "running/cranking" compression? If too high you could try
> double gasket or a shim to lower it. With no "squish" to worry about this is
> viable.
Do you mean like this?
http://www.misterfixit.com/dyncompr.htm
Static compression on this motor was intentionally raised because I
designed it to run on propane. No real research was done. I didn't know
enough at that time to think about squish etc.
Bruce, what do you think about these two tradeoffs:
* higher compression (say 9.5:1) and less ignition lead,
* lower compression (say 8.5:1) and more ignition lead.
The two seem to balance in "sign" but I don't know about magnitude. Eg.
is more ignition lead better than more compression...?
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin