A few comments here.  I can't 
  recall the last time someone stole a AMC anything ...  
   Chances are the crooks were interested 
  in money, or valuables in the home and were  
   casing it for future 
  whatever. Again, it appears to me that they are after something 
  else  
   besides a old Rambler. 
   
  Except it wasn't an 'old Rambler' but a fairly high-end (for 
  AMCs) and well-known 
  
  (for AMCs) vintage car. In both visits, their interest was the 
  garage. Had they been 
  seeking entry into the home, it would have been stealthier to go 
  in through the back 
  door rather than fiddle out front with the biggest door on the 
  place. Further, cash and
  other valuables will be in every home on the block, 
  in every neighborhood, in every 
  state. Why would they risk returning to the very same 
  home to fiddle with the very 
  same garage? Because what they seek is in that one 
  garage. WHY they want it is 
  not a part of the equation. Remember the video of the 
  guy sneaking into his neighbor's 
  back yard to steal the woman's undies from the 
  clothesline repeatedly? Before seeing
  that, would you have believed that was what he was 
  after? It might make no sense to
  you and I, but it only has to be reasonable to the 
  thief.
   
  Didn't the car owner have a cell 
  phone with camera to take these people's photos? 
   
  No. And would you bet your life they weren't armed and wouldn't 
  get awful upset that 
  you took the photo? Thinking with your nuts gets people dead. 
  Self-preservation comes
  first- catching them is 
  secondary.
   
  Did the neighbor call 
  911? Breaking and entering is a felony, and police have a under  
   5 minute response time for that! 
   
  Except they hadn't broken in yet, nor 
  entered yet.
   
  It is good 
  that the neighbor called police, but she should have not told these people 
  she  
  was and shuold have called 911 silently. 
   
  And if the cops are slow 
  enough to respond, the car is gone. I'd be far happier knowing 
  
  they left without 
  it.
   
  So hopefully you will realize that these people, 
  whoever they are, were not after a old AMC. 
  Furthermore, if they were serious, it 
  would already be gone. 
   
  There are pros, and there are amatuers. Even amateurs 
  can get lucky. They have to start 
  somewhere. This attempt didn't fly. Anyone that 
  wishes to tempt them with their own car 
  can leave it on the lawn. Those that don't can take 
  the precaustions they see fit to- which 
  is the reason for the 
  warning.
   
  What bothers me most is while something 
  obviously happened, the car owner 'believed'  
  these characters... these people could have told the car owner they got 
  the info from  
   John Paul 
  II instead off website 
  somewhere. 
   
  ...because then we would have 
  believed them? The point isn't WHERE the info came 
  from
  or what they claimed. 
  It's that they were there, looking for access to 
  that car and that they 
  
  haven't been caught. If 
  there's a 
  report of a tiger running loose in my neighborhood, I'm not 
  
  putting my kid on the 
  porch to 
  prove tigers aren't indigenous to northern New Jersey. I'll 
  
  protect the kid first, 
  THEN wait 
  to see if a tiger is ever 
  caught.
   
  Not offended, just surprised that you're 
  concentrating on the wrong point of the 
  warning.
  Still love ya though...just not THAT way.  ; 
  )
   
  John