see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_Scotsman_(train) : ) Ken Quoting Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>: > > Victor the Cleaner wrote: > > > My first car, a '64 Classic, had them, so I never had a reason to think > > about them until now. Clearly that was about the time they were > introduced. > > I haven't yet researched the literature to determine when they made the > > transition from option to standard equipment. > > Hmm, I need to check my assumptions. I'm not much of a literature > collector, I have only a full-line 62 and a few 70's brochures. For 62 > the dual master brake was new, galvanized rockers etc. No mention of > seatbelts, and no photo shows one. > > I was reminded that Rambler called the old 195.6 (both versions) the > FLYING SCOT. Which, to be honest, I think is hilarious, and must have > sounded very 19th century even in 1962. > > My friend Scot (two t's though) is fairly heavy, and if I threw him, > would not go far, would involve a lot of grunting, and when he was again > able to rise, well, I would have to run away. That's about right, > overhead valves or not. > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list