[Amc-list] Nick Frank or Davis - thermostats
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Amc-list] Nick Frank or Davis - thermostats
- From: "Thomas, Jeff" <jeff.thomas@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:05:50 -0400
Guys,
Do you have a recommendation for a thermostat brand/heat range on a
newly rebuilt, mainly stock AMC 360 4BBL. I have the 6090 heads from an
73
AMC 401 if that helps. After my break-in, my engine seems to be running
hot.
J T
-----Original Message-----
From: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, March 19, 2008 1:53 PM
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Amc-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 56
Send Amc-list mailing list submissions to
amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
You can reach the person managing the list at
amc-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
"Re: Contents of Amc-list digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Zinc oils/roller engine/scraper (Sandwich Maker)
2. Re: Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American (Jim Blair)
3. Re: Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American
(Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx)
4. 401 oil mods (Nick ALFANO)
5. Re: IH auto question (Jim Blair)
6. Re: Swap 2.5 AMC for 2.5 Iron Duke in Eagle (Sandwich Maker)
7. Re: Swap 2.5 AMC for 2.5 Iron Duke in Eagle (Jim Blair)
8. Re: flat tappet oil (Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx)
9. Re: IH auto question (Sandwich Maker)
10. Re: Bend Over & Grab your Ankels - Combustion Chamber
'Groovin' (Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx)
11. Re: Zinc oils/roller engine/scraper (Jim Blair)
12. Re: Turboed AMC 2.5 L (Greg Taylor)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:59:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Zinc oils/roller engine/scraper
To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <200803191659.m2JGxLI14404@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
" From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
"
" 4. Fram isn't the only one to have had problems.
" []
" I was told that some NAPA filters (and a couple other brands, probably
sourced from the same manufacturer) did the same, but they were quickly
pulled from the shelves.
" []
" So a lot of people won't use Fram to this day.
it's been a while since i trolled the filter-comparison sites, but back
then the highest rated filter with the most consistently good quality
was ac delco.
i recall that many of the brands you see are actually the same and made
by the same few plants.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:03:14 -0700
From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American
To: "amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <BAY122-W473A36CD717100CBD3579AAC070@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
A: If something were to happen and say a reasonably pristine Rambler
with a dead 196 were to fall into my hands (MUAHAHAHAHA!) then I would
be VERY tempted to mod the intake/exhaust of an AMC 2.5L to run in the
car. (tuck the header pipe closer, lift and curl the intake runners
similar to late model Ford 300s) I picked up a fun looking little carb
(Arram?) that is variable venturi that might end up on the BG241 IH
motor to see if a little more oomph and MPGs can be squeezed out of it
(6 MPG! Liquid gold flushed away down the HO*LE* 1 bbl!) before we give
up.
From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <47E07F22.9050007@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Mark, you're pretty much SOL. All the later sixes are way to long for
the "small" American body (58-63). You will have to rebuild the engine
you have or swap something else in. That probably gets you to thinking
a modern four would be good, but those have a problem -- they are too
WIDE for the small American engine bay due to the intake manifold being
far from the engine. Some may fit, but not without some sheet metal
surgery under the hood, and then it will still be tight. A 60 degree V-6
sounds good, but has the same width problem
-- the accessories are mounted "wide" on all the rear drive
configurations.
If you don't mind spending money on "hot rod" style accessory mounts,
any 60*
V-6 (2.8L - 3.4L Chevy, 2.9L - 4.0L Ford) can be made to work. You'll
need the transmission too, and will need to have the driveshaft
modified. Due to the accessory brackets and even changing some of them,
this can be expensive!
There is, however, a reasonably affordable swap -- a Ford 200 or 250
I-6.
They are small bore/long stroke just like the old 195.6, and are short
enough to fit! They also have the intake cast as part of the head, and
are narrow enough too. Don't confuse the 200/250 with the older 240
(used through 64 or so in cars and trucks) or 300 (used through the 90s
in trucks only). Those are too long!
I would try to find a 250 from a mid 80s car. I'd only use a 200 if you
run across one at a great deal (many Mustangs and Falcons came with
them and are being converted to V-8s), why when you can get the bigger
model for about the same price? You will need the transmission and have
to have the driveshaft modified, but it won't be costly. In fact, it
won't cost any more than rebuilding a 195.6, even if you have to rebuild
the Ford six. There is the engine mount issue, but that can be solved
relatively easy.
I wouldn't normally condone swapping a non-AMC engine in an AMC, but in
this case it's not a bad idea. The 195.6 is dependable, but it's costly
to rebuild and many parts are very hard to find. The Ford parts are
still readily available, at least by overnight delivery from a
warehouse. Getting the correct water pump for a 195.6 is difficult,
even when waiting several days for it to come in! It will cost $1000+
to properly rebuild the 195.6. That includes boring oversize and
getting new pistons, and if you do a lot of the work. It cost me around
$800 when I built one in the early 90s, and I was told I got the last
set of pistons NAPA had on the east coast. Now you have to get them
from Egge Machine, or get lucky and find an NOS set. I have a set, but
forget now if they are L-head or OHV pistons -- I think they are
L-head. Saving for a "rainy day" project... So if restoring, build the
original engine -- nothing more you can do! If it's a driver, well,
store the original and make bolt-on mods where you can.
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail?-get
your "fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/7f2a3f9e
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:19:22 +0000
From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<031920081719.6597.47E14B1A000C8876000019C52216566276CDCBCD0A0C079D9F059
D0E03@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Now. me, I would go with a Turbo'd AMC 2.5L Pushing thru an 700r4 since
it is a BOLTUP transmission!
Way to tempting to pass up.
Think about it.
It stays AMC, It gets an O/D trans that has all kinds of backing in the
aftermarket, plus that low first gear to get the little 2.5 rolling and
up into boost quick!
Man, think 7lb of boost or so and second gear shift would be a
handlfull!!!
Clear the fenderwheels?
Come on, go look on evil bay at 2.5L intakes. You could not ask for an
easier intake to mod.
Pick up a header to feed the turbo and modify it.
If you got lucky you could use the cast exhaust and wrap the pipe under
the engine and put the turbo on the right side. lok at some of the
Wrangler series headers as they actualy wrap under the engine to begin
with!
Even normally asperated you could get a fun litle package put
together pretty easily.
Forget the six since AMC never gave us a good V6.
Unless you want to consider the 4.7L dodge V8 as AMC's last design as
some do.
Then you could look at the 3.7L family of dodge V6's as "from the same
line".
Dare to be different! [as long as it's AMC powered]....
--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrc II " Chronic Pain Hurts"
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> A: If something were to happen and say a reasonably pristine Rambler
> with a dead
> 196
> were to fall into my hands (MUAHAHAHAHA!) then I would be VERY tempted
> to mod the intake/exhaust of an AMC 2.5L to run in the car. (tuck the
> header pipe closer, lift and curl the intake runners similar to late
> model Ford 300s) I picked up a fun looking little carb (Arram?) that
> is variable venturi that might end up on the BG241 IH motor to see if
> a little more oomph and MPGs can be squeezed out of it (6 MPG! Liquid
> gold flushed away down the HO*LE* 1 bbl!) before we give up.
>
>
> From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Engine Interchange, 58 Rambler American
> To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <47E07F22.9050007@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Mark, you're pretty much SOL. All the later sixes are way to long for
> the "small" American body (58-63). You will have to rebuild the
> engine you have or swap something else in. That probably gets you to
> thinking a modern four would be good, but those have a problem --
> they are too WIDE for the small American engine bay due to the intake
> manifold being far from the engine. Some may fit, but not without
> some sheet metal surgery under the hood, and then it will still be
> tight. A 60 degree V-6 sounds good, but has the same width problem
> -- the accessories are mounted "wide" on all the rear drive
configurations.
> If you don't mind spending money on "hot rod" style accessory mounts,
> any 60*
> V-6 (2.8L - 3.4L Chevy, 2.9L - 4.0L Ford) can be made to work. You'll
> need the transmission too, and will need to have the driveshaft
> modified. Due to the accessory brackets and even changing some of
them, this can be expensive!
>
> There is, however, a reasonably affordable swap -- a Ford 200 or 250
I-6.
> They are small bore/long stroke just like the old 195.6, and are
> short enough to fit! They also have the intake cast as part of the
> head, and are narrow enough too. Don't confuse the 200/250 with the
> older 240 (used through 64 or so in cars and trucks) or 300 (used
> through the 90s in trucks only). Those are too long!
>
> I would try to find a 250 from a mid 80s car. I'd only use a 200 if
> you run across one at a great deal (many Mustangs and Falcons came
> with them and are being converted to V-8s), why when you can get the
> bigger model for about the same price? You will need the transmission
> and have to have the driveshaft modified, but it won't be costly. In
> fact, it won't cost any more than rebuilding a 195.6, even if you have
> to rebuild the Ford six. There is the engine mount issue, but that can
> be solved relatively easy.
>
> I wouldn't normally condone swapping a non-AMC engine in an AMC, but
> in this case it's not a bad idea. The 195.6 is dependable, but it's
> costly to rebuild and many parts are very hard to find. The Ford
> parts are still readily available, at least by overnight delivery
> from a warehouse. Getting the correct water pump for a 195.6 is
> difficult, even when waiting several days for it to come in! It will
> cost $1000+ to properly rebuild the 195.6. That includes boring
> oversize and getting new pistons, and if you do a lot of the work. It
> cost me around $800 when I built one in the early 90s, and I was told
> I got the last set of pistons NAPA had on the east coast. Now you
> have to get them from Egge Machine, or get lucky and find an NOS set.
> I have a set, but forget now if they are L-head or OHV pistons -- I
> think they are L-head. Saving for a "rainy day" project... So if
> restoring, build the original engine -- nothing more you can do! If
it's a driver, well, store the original and make bolt-on mods where you
can.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your
Hotmail(r)-get
> your "fix".
> http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/7f2a3f
> 9e/attachm
> ent.htm
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:25:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nick ALFANO <71amx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Amc-list] 401 oil mods
To: amc list <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <29987.60001.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Davis,
I agree. Some think secrets about what they do to an engine are what
make them seem knowledgeable and in demand (some even like we are
competing for a prize). I have a couple 70 390s that we will probably
dyno if the customer gives me the go ahead. I would be more than happy
to list the specs on any of them. They are both 10.5:1 engines on pump
gas. Both have hydraulic roller cams with very different specs as one
was put together for a Rebel Machine using the stock exhaust manifolds
and intake so it will be interesting to see how well it worked.
I did list a while back the specs for a 401 we built with ported
Edelbrock heads and a roller cam for a 70 shadow mask AMX that was in
Popular Hot Rodding 2 years ago. It had over 500 hp on pump gas, never
got about 185 degrees and the guy could drive it anywhere.
I have another 401 with the Indy heads, solid roller cam using my shaft
rocker set up that I will be putting on the dyno later this spring. We
plan to test it with a carb and then switch over to the new Fuel
Injection kit we are working on to see where the differences are.
Nick
Alfano Performance
4849-76 st.
Kenosha, WI. 53142
262-308-1302
262-942-8271 after 6pm central and weekends
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 19:31:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Davis Martin <martin-davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] 401 Oil Mods
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <50556.2115.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Armand,
I have a sprare set of nice thick stainless flanges if you need them
Email me off list.
I Will definitly post all the engne specs from th eblue print sheet
and then th edyno results.
I hope that our testing helps other AmCers
I think it sucks folks want to keep secrets about what they did to get
X out of their amc engine.
Davis
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:29:12 -0700
From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] IH auto question
To: "amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <BAY122-W9F146EF824EDA874EB2E7AC070@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
So what parts would I need to mate the 258 to the BW? V8 bell and zero
balanced flexplate? Starter? I like to try to keep projects fairly
mobile and haven't been able to keep up this past year (since my broken
rib in the rollover last spring)
Jim Blair, Lynnwood, WA '87 Comanche, '83 Jeep J10, '84 Jeep J10
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] IH auto question
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <200803191344.m2JDiDH05828@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
" From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"
" '66 to '69 Travelall with IH 304 auto (2wd) is supposed to have a BW
auto? If so, any relation to anything AMC?
yup, iron case, same as amc. switched to tf in '72, same as amc...
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_________________________________________________________________
Helping your favorite cause is as easy as instant messaging.?You IM, we
give.
http://im.live.com/Messenger/IM/Home/?source=text_hotmail_join
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/1a2d8f86
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:34:46 -0400 (EDT)
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Swap 2.5 AMC for 2.5 Iron Duke in Eagle
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <200803191734.m2JHYkS15817@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
" From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
"
" The Iron Duke as used by AMC (and all pre-84 AFAIK) use the small "
block Chevy bell pattern. Later ones use the same pattern as the AMC "
four -- the small Chevy pattern (used on most, if not all, fours and "
all 60 degree V-6s, and the Cadillac 4.1/4.5L V-8s -- not sure if the "
Northstar uses it or not, but might).
the northstar and 'shortstar' v6 both do, and many of gm's 'newer'
engines, including the last gen of the buick v6 used briefly by kaiser.
" A suspension designer who worked for Jeep at the time claims that the
" XJ was intentionally designed NOT to use the AMC I-6 because the "
designer "didn't like it".
many old-line jeepers thought the relatively big, heavy straight six was
a disaster for a little 4x4.
" I'm not sure how the engine mounts changed in the Eagle when they "
switched to the AMC four. It was only used a year or two before being "
dropped. I suggest you visit the Eagle Nest (www.amceaglenest.com) and "
ask about the engine mounts.
i was just told by a senior jeep mechanic that the mounts are the same
and in the same place as the six mounts - 'it's just like a six with the
front 2 cylinders cut off'. they don't carry the same p/n in the
'94-6 parts manual though.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:35:30 -0700
From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Swap 2.5 AMC for 2.5 Iron Duke in Eagle
To: "amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <BAY122-W443EB06478AA2E5F130374AC070@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Find an '84 up Eagle with AMC 4 cyl and score the mounts and engine
crossbar. You'll need the trans bell too (if std trans. If 904 auto, I
can sell you the whole trans or just the trans case, flex plate and
converter from an XJ that had TBI). Still have the T5 crossbar sitting
here from the '83 J10 (TOTALLY forgot about it till I tripped over it
yesterday!)
AX-5 is easy to swap IF the input shaft is the same. (we just pulled one
from my son's GF's XJ that we made 4x4 after the tip of the 2wd shifter
dropped inside the trans when it wouldn't shift due to a suddenly broken
clutch pedal!)
From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Swap 2.5 AMC for 2.5 Iron Duke in Eagle
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <47E12B01.8050106@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
The Iron Duke as used by AMC (and all pre-84 AFAIK) use the small block
Chevy bell pattern. Later ones use the same pattern as the AMC four --
the small Chevy pattern (used on most, if not all, fours and all 60
degree V-6s, and the Cadillac 4.1/4.5L V-8s -- not sure if the Northstar
uses it or not, but might).
Most believe that AMC used that pattern for their engine so that it
could use the same drivetrain (mainly transmission) as the V-6 Cherokee
(84-86 models used a GM 2.8L V-6, hardly worth more than the 2.5L
four!). At the time AMC had planned on continuing to use the V-6. A
suspension designer who worked for Jeep at the time claims that the XJ
was intentionally designed NOT to use the AMC I-6 because the designer
"didn't like it". I'd have preferred the carbed 258 to the 2.8L V-6, but
that's just me! The firewall was redesigned and the front of the engine
modified to make the 4.0L fit.
I'm not sure how the engine mounts changed in the Eagle when they
switched to the AMC four. It was only used a year or two before being
dropped. I suggest you visit the Eagle Nest (www.amceaglenest.com) and
ask about the engine mounts.
-----------------
Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 07:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jesse <j2sax@xxxxxxxxx>
What has to be changed if I want to put a 2.5 AMC engine in my Eagle
which currently has an Iron Duke?
For those that don't know, the bellhousing is not the same on the AMC
2.5 as other AMC's... but is it the same as the Iron Duke?
What are the differences in the crossmembers?
--
Frank Swygert
Publisher, "American Motors Cars"
Magazine (AMC)
For all AMC enthusiasts
http://farna.home.att.net/AMC.html
(free download available!)
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail?-get
your "fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/cd2576fb
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:37:49 +0000
From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] flat tappet oil
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<031920081737.8306.47E14F6D000BF65B000020722216566276CDCBCD0A0C079D9F059
D0E03@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Yeah, tried it synthetic in our current 97 XJ and the puddles got
bigger!
On my 96 it had a drip from the rear main.
I switched to Penzzoil synthetic cause it used to be over a $1.00 a
quart cheaper then Mobile One.
Anyway, in the 96 I switched to synthetics at 50k and within a 1,000
miles the rear main seal stopped leaking!!!
I had it for about another 4 years and 50K and it never leaked again.
I'm 500 miles short of 40K on my 04 WJ and it's getting switched over to
synthetic when it hits 40K.
I hope to keep it for a very long time.
Love the thing.
It gets 15-16mpg in town, 19-21mpg highway, V8, lots of fun to drive
too.
Of course when gas gets about $4 a gallon I'll probably be reconsidering
it...maybe not.
--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrc II " Chronic Pain Hurts"
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
> I can tell you this much -- if your car is using a bit of oil it will
> DRINK synthetic!
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:41:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] IH auto question
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Message-ID: <200803191741.m2JHfQR16794@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
" From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
"
" So what parts would I need to mate the 258 to the BW? V8 bell and zero
balanced flexplate? Starter?
that'd be my guess. starter oughta be stock - did v8 stick and auto
share, or have separate apps? a 290/304 converter should be in the
ballpark too, since the 258's torque comes on lower than the v8's.
this is assuming a '72-up six.
" From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
"
" " From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
" "
" " '66 to '69 Travelall with IH 304 auto (2wd) is supposed to have a BW
auto? If so, any relation to anything AMC?
"
" yup, iron case, same as amc. switched to tf in '72, same as amc...
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
------------------------------
Message: 10
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:42:16 +0000
From: Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Bend Over & Grab your Ankels - Combustion
Chamber 'Groovin'
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID:
<031920081742.23488.47E150780008DA4D00005BC02216566276CDCBCD0A0C079D9F05
9D0E03@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Don't have to go that far north.
We got about 6-8" of topsoil here, then it's all rock!
If I dig a hole, I need a pick... Or a jackhammer.
I've rented electric jackhammers so many times I I know which one sucks
at the rental place!!!
--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrc II
" Chronic Pain Hurts"
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Davis Martin <martin-davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> That's right Us new englanders are all set with rocks.
> LOL
> Davis
>
> Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> " From: Brien Tourville
> "
> "
> "
> " OK - who here admits to having at one time owned a 'Pet Rock' ?
>
> hey, i live in new england -- i don' need no steenkin -pet- rocks!
>
________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay the genius nature
> internet rambler is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
>
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/926f4aa2
/attachm
> ent.htm
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
------------------------------
Message: 11
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:43:30 -0700
From: Jim Blair <carnuck@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Zinc oils/roller engine/scraper
To: "amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <BAY122-W29FF4F529EDA6716EB4206AC070@xxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
NAPA had a small run of filters that didn't have any threads, but AFAIK,
none were recalled at least in the past 5 years (other than some
mislabeled ones). I know there is a newer Mopar filter that just came
out that looks like a 1085 (book even says it is) but we got an email to
NOT sell one to a customer because there is a difference that could
cause engine damage.
If you find a Fram PH11 on a parts store shelf with the rubber grip
dip, I would pass on it!
Jim Blair, Lynnwood, WA '87 Comanche, '83 Jeep J10, '84 Jeep J10
From: Davis Martin <martin-davis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Zinc oils/roller engine/scraper
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <930184.40084.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
4. Fram isn't the only one to have had problems. Seems like it was 5-10
years ago that they got a lot of filters with faulty (or no) by-pass
valves. Some engines would blow them off or swell them up in short
order! By now the problem has been fixed, but they apparently never
recalled them, just let them run out through the distribution system. I
was told that some NAPA filters (and a couple other brands, probably
sourced from the same manufacturer) did the same, but they were quickly
pulled from the shelves. I do know that more Fram filters caused more
people problems than any others over a longer period of time -- that
they didn't pull them is speculation on my part. They may have, but too
many got out before they did -- IF they did (so many Fram filter stories
that I don't think they could pulled them). So a lot of people won't use
Fram to this day.
This is true. I have never heard any bad stories on K&N filters and
I will stick with them.
Davis
_________________________________________________________________
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail?-get
your "fix".
http://www.msnmobilefix.com/Default.aspx
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/e5ba7b80
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 10:52:45 -0700 (PDT)
From: Greg Taylor <amundaza@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Turboed AMC 2.5 L
To: "AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans." <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Message-ID: <10460.71546.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
I know someone who had a supercharged 2.5L in a built Wrangler. In low
gear crawl, it would climb the front tires right up a wall at idle. he
absolutely loved that Jeep.
Greg :) <><
Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Now. me, I would go with a Turbo'd AMC 2.5L
Pushing thru an 700r4 since it is a BOLTUP transmission!
Way to tempting to pass up.
Think about it.
It stays AMC, It gets an O/D trans that has all kinds of backing in the
aftermarket, plus that low first gear to get the little 2.5 rolling and
up into boost quick!
Man, think 7lb of boost or so and second gear shift would be a
handlfull!!!
---------------------------------
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo!
Search.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080319/62da2515
/attachment.htm
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
End of Amc-list Digest, Vol 15, Issue 56
****************************************
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin