Re: [Amc-list] T96, T14 clutch -- final numbers

[Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>]

I have a 64 Classic T-95+OD and bellhousing here, the AMerican
T96+OD obviously, 69 T14 non-OD, and T150+OD (75? 76?).

I didn't follow through on my bellhousing page (I just dont'
ahve much data (thoug Andrew sent photos)) but I will add all
these to it.



On Thu, 28 Feb 2008, Frank Swygert wrote:

> Didn't know the bolt pattern changed Andrew! All the T-96s I've had dealings with are 63 and earlier. Tom's is a 63 American, which has the bell housing rear mounts. Even the 63 Classic T-96 I had used the small bolt pattern even though it used a trans mount, so that's not an indicator. Hmmmm.... maybe it is though! I used the 63 Classic T-96 on a 79 multi-pattern bell. Only difference was the diameter of the front bearing retainer (smaller on the T-96). I drilled an old SR4 retainer to fit the T-96 and it worked fine. The retainer centers the trans -- I had to be careful drilling new holes in it, and just got lucky!
>
> I have an older bell to check with, just have to locate the trans now.
>
> --------------
> Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:08:07 -0500 (EST)
> From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
>
> i've forgotten - does your car have the rear mount on the bell or the
> tranny?  the t96 pattern changed that year [iirc the lower bolts
> moved - down 1"].  i don't know of any other differences on the tranny
> nose between the t96 and car t14.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list