Re: [AMC-List] my 62 classic project

[Mark Price <markprice242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

My thoughts are that being that far short would require a coupler/shaft between the trans and the driveshaft, complicating things. I guess you could use the Jeep tailhousing over a car T-5 output shaft and work things out from there. Still a lot of work to keep a torque tube.
--
Mark Price
markprice242ATadelphia.net
Morgantown, WV


---- Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
> " From: Mark Price <markprice242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> " 
> " I think the Jeep tailhousing will be too short to work for adapting to a torque tube. You will likely end up a good foot shorter than the torque tube tranny!
> 
> better too short than too long!  plenty of room to machine a block
> with the tailhousing pattern on one side and the torque tube pattern
> on the other - and while we're at it, a tranny mount on the bottom and
> speedo drive on the side...
> 
> i think the only showstopper would be if the mainshaft is way too
> short.  there are longish output yokes that can make up a few inches.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay                                  the genius nature
> internet rambler                            is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> AMC-List mailing list
> AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> 
> or go to http://www.amc-list.com

_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

or go to http://www.amc-list.com