Tom - I'm glad to see your questions about power brakes - kinda odd the way I'm dealing with the same or similar issues right now. My '62 Cross Country has power brakes, and last week I pulled the master cylinder and booster. Got all the rust off of both, then I bought an NOS rebuild kit off of Ebay and was planning to rebuild the stuff this week. My question is: Rather than rebuild my existing components, would I be better off pulling a booster and master cylinder from a newer junkyard car? A couple months back someone posted that they were using a brake setup from an S10 or Sonoma, and I'm wondering if retrofitting newer components is really the way to go. The main issues I see are 1) clearance (although that booster I pulled is about as big as they come!) and 2) how easily a retrofit will fit with the existing brake pedal linkage. Are there other issues, like how much braking power I need? If I retrofit, should I look to pull a master cyklinder and booster from a car equivalently as heavy as my '62 wagon? Thanks for everything, guys. - Justin -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 Message:0003 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-Id: <24EE71DD-E93E-4180-9649-D5C0BB9781FB@xxxxxxx> To: AMC List <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Subject: power brake boosters Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 20:38:40 -0800 So what's the deal with power brake boosters? I have very little experience with them (few of my cars have had power brakes!) and I've got a bad one; it leaks down less than 20 seconds after the engine's off, and it has a "stiff spot" (low assist) on the first bit of travel (feels like "stiction" in the pedal or linkage, but I checked very carefully). The only replacement I can find is $110 from NAPA, and comes with a master cylinder. I don't need one of those, I ahve a new one installed. Are boosters generally interchangable? Are they rebuildable at home? Kits? I suspect there's only two or three physical types (in AMC land) but I have no way to identify them. 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-Id: <03911394-A8AB-4AE8-94F6-75CA04FD31CE@xxxxxxx> From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Subject: Re: 1984 AMC Eagle and Intake Manfold ID Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 21:33:50 -0800 To: mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > I knew the valve covers were an issue. As I mentioned in another > post, my 86 is leaking. One thing about this 84. Most valve covers > seem to have bolts around the edges to hold the cover on (as it > appears to be in the procedure that, I beleive it was Wayne, posted > the link to. But on this 84 it has 2 (I think it was 2) studs or > bolts coming up through the valve cover to hold it. Are there metal > replacements for that style? Yeah, the aftermarket covers (like the finned aluminum job I got from AK Jacobs) require you to tap those holes, 5/16" and 1/4" I think (something like that) and comes with allen head bolts. The real problem is that there simply aren't enough holes around the perimeter, on this or any of this AMC six, really. I would like to see one every 4 - 6 inches. I miss my old Gen 1 V8 here -- huge, fat rubber gaskets, cover held on with two wing-nutted studs. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11 Message:0011 11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 16:01:16 -0700 Message-Id: <200510301601.AA373162266@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> From: "hhclutter" <hhclutter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: 1969 Javelin for sale! I am in Abilene Texas on business and saw this ad in the American Classifieds paper. "1969 Javelin (AMC) 290 (4 bbl) 3 sp, restored, immaculate, Spoiler, traction bars, extras. 325-338-2297." If you are interested, contact the seller directly. I don't know anything about the car other that what is in the ad infor above. Howard Clutter 67 Rogue convertible 72 Javelin -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12 Message:0012 12 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 09:16:50 -0800 From: "Ralph Ausmann" <ralph.ausmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Fw: Tire sizes To: "AMC List" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Message-id: <002801c5dd75$b8101120$0200a8c0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Can anyone help with the tire sizes for James here. Please copy him in direct as he apparently is not a list member. (James Finholt <jfinholt1@xxxxxxxxxxx>) James, you can join the AMC-List at www.amxfiles.com. List members are very responsive with information and you will get more immediate results than is usual with other such list groups. ______________________________________________________________ Ralph Ausmann - Hillsboro, OR - > ralph.ausmann@xxxxxxxxx http://mysite.verizon.net/res79g4m/ ... and "check the links" ----- Original Message ----- From: James and Christi Finholt To: ralph.ausmann@xxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 8:48 AM Subject: Tire sizes Good Morning! I am trying to locate what tire options are available for my 1967 Rebel SST convertible. I have been searching the Internet for several weeks and have not been able to locate a source that lists the size options for this car. It is nearing completion on the restoration so it is time to select the tires and rims. I want to go "old school" and large in the back and smaller in the front but no source I find lists the factory sizings or limitations Can you help??? James A. and Christi D. Finholt 3510 16th Court South Salem, OR 97302 503.588.9111 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13 Message:0013 13 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Message-Id: <F5EF9FC7-4062-475A-845D-BFAC24B805BC@xxxxxxx> To: AMC List <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> Subject: more brake booster Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2005 22:57:48 -0800 Erm, it seems I have a drum brake booster behind my disk brake master cylinder. The Rock Auto site has links to Cardone pages, which has excellent photos by the way (I assume they are correct :-) I got the booster with the car, as parts-in-the-trunk, but I am fairly sure it came off the car, which did have drums up front. It's also a bellcrank linkage model (booster lives on an adapter that accomodates the bellcrank and pushes it away from the firewall). I know the drum booster is single-diaphragm and the disk is double. This is just fine by me, I dislike feather-touch brakes. A major feature is that the drum booster is inches shallower, something to keep in mind for oddball installs. The booster is just a simple servo, right? There's no weirdness ie. drum vs. disk is there? Just fit and amount of boost? (Since I'm plumbed for the disk brake master cyl on the end of the drum brake booster I'd rather keep it this way, the lessened boost is only a plus. It's luxurious compared to the Rambler, '79 disk setup with no boost at all).