Re: Re: [BaadAssGremlins] Re: The Gremlin Engine Poll...Explained

[<badass73gremlin@xxxx>]

> 
> From: Plumpy72@xxxx
> Date: 2003/12/21 Sun AM 09:15:53 EST
> To: BaadAssGremlins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [BaadAssGremlins] Re: The Gremlin Engine Poll...Explained
> 
> In a message dated 12/20/2003 7:57:09 PM Central Standard Time, 
> lumina3@xxxx writes:
> 
> > I'll do a net search.
> > Looks like I'll be frowned upon if I don't stick w/AMC engine...fine 
> > with me - I think it will be easier to mount the AMC anyway; sticking 
> > to the original maker...more appropriate too. I guess I am just tired 
> > of fighting to find parts. Hmmm....do love AMC though....
> 
> There is yet another advantage to the AMC V8. If someone does ask to look 
> under the hood, chances are pretty good that they won't even be able to tell if 
> it's a 290, 304, 360, 390 or 401. I have often wondered how many times someone 
> has tried to pass off their 401 as a 304?
> 
> You won't have any regrets keeping it AMC
> 
> Rick
> 
> 
> 
> I tell people all the time my 360 is really a spray painted INDY 500 c.i alum AMC V8 LOL
Bart