Re: [AMC-list] early 232 using 258 intake??

[Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>]

Andrew: would that apply to the 74 258 as well? If so I might have one. Anyone know how deep that pulley should be?

Bruce: You can keep the existing rear axle with no problem. You would just have to have a driveshaft made with the front end for the T-14 and the rear for the big nut axle. I know, to most why not upgrade and make it easier to mess with the driveshaft later, but if you have a hard time finding an axle that easily fits... Oh, an early (pre 93, I think) Ranger axle would fit good. It's only an inch or so wider, and will work with stock wheels. Might have to relocate the spring pads, I'm not sure. I can point you to the measurements if needed though.

-----------------
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:50:06 -0400 (EDT)
From:adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  (Sandwich Maker)
" Having a hard time finding a '65 232 pulley for a short shaft water
" pump ('65 American w/ 232, later CJ5 with 232). Not sure what options
" from other manufacturers will swap in.

iirc*any*jeep*  '65-'74 with the 232 will have the short pump and
pulley.  this means big jeeps too!

On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:57 PM, tom jennings<tomj@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
bruce - '68-'70 americans and javelins with 232 have the t14 and
driveshaft you'd need, and while you can't use the jav rear [too wide],
any '66-9 non-big-nut m15 american rear will do.


--
Frank Swygert
Publisher, "American Motors Cars"
Magazine (AMC)
For all AMC enthusiasts
http://www.amc-mag.com
(free download available!)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20111001/b9693c2c/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com