Re: [AMC-list] 1057 vs. 2057

[Wrambler <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I looked for 2357s for mine, none in stock at that time.
I'm glad you mentioned them, I wanted to go to them, but hated to special order them without having heard from anybody on what they may do to lenses!  I guess I can get some now! I always think brighter is better! Specially without the high mount brake light!


Mark Price
Morgantown, WV 26508
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
"I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens!"

----- Original Message -----
From: "tom jennings" <tomj@xxxxxxx>
To: "Rambler AMC, Nash, Jeep and family" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2009 6:09:59 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] 1057 vs. 2057

On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 14:45, Wrambler <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 2057 is brighter in lumens and has a slightly shorter life.
> They interchange fine, maybe a possibility of extra heat distorting a lens
> in a housing that is small.
> I have not had that issue with mine.


I'm using 2357's in all my cars, even brighter than 2057's, and no problems
at all, not even the 63 classic, where the lens is small. They seem to last
years too.



-- 
All of your arguments are invalid.
Enjoy your unstable system.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20090531/9a70e0af/attachment.htm>
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com