Re: [Amc-list] OBD 1 (not 2) hacking/tuning.... was Re: OBD II Scan tools

[Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I don't care much why they did it.
Just sucks that they did.
if I was energetic and the car did not run so darned good, I'd toss the ecu and put something mor euser friendly in there.
   Hesco used to have a source for deleting the rev limiter from the ecu, but I don't know what the fuel curve would be like above the rev limit.
  I have to assume it is O.K, but...

I don't really need it anyway. 

--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
" I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens! "

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx>
> I think this is because Chrysler wasn't cooperating with the aftermarket 
> and there wasn't a standard they had to follow. From what I remember 
> when it came out, ODB II is much more standardized but you do sometimes 
> need factory equipment for certain things (like dealing with body 
> computers for ABS and such).
> 
> Matt
> 
> On 9/24/2008 10:17 AM, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx spouted this sage advice:
> > Bummer, nothing for Chrysler OBD I
> 
> -- 
> mhaas@xxxxxxx
> Cincinnati, OH
> http://www.mattsoldcars.com
> 1967 Rambler American wagon
> 1968 Rambler American sedan
> =================================================================
> According to a February 2003 survey of Internet holdouts released
> by UCLA's Center for Communication Policy, people cite
> not having a computer as the No. 1 reason they won't go online.
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list