Re: [Amc-list] SR-4/T-4 in an American

[Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>]

http://wps.com/AMC/Bellhousings/

Not much, but it's a start... there's an 'early' six and a 'late'
multi-drilled bell there...

Andrew, I guess I better put up that image you sent me months ago!!


On Wed, 7 May 2008, Frank Swygert wrote:

> Hmm.... imagine it. I know 100% that I was using a multi pattern bell, that's what the SR-4 came off of. So it's possible I am mistaken, that the top holes on the T-96 and SR-4 aren't the same. It was a while ago, and I simply forgot about the multi-pattern bell until you mentioned it! If I hadn't said "I'm positive" everything would have been okay and I wouldn't have made such a mistake, but...
>
> -------------
> Date: Wed, 7 May 2008 10:20:49 -0400 (EDT)
> From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
>
> this nags at me.  i haven't actually had the trannies and bells
> together, but from all i've read they are not the same, starting with
> the bolt pattern pg in the advance adapters cat.  also, the pic in
> http://www.calponycars.com/prodDetail.php?prodId=371 clearly shows
> widely separate holes - which afaik agree with the aa data - and going
> by tom's statement that the top inner ones exactly match the amc t96...
>
> but i can't imagine you making this kind of mistake either, even if
> you were using a multipattern bell drilled for both trannies.
> --
> there looks to be plenty of room on the cal pony plate for rambler-
> spaced lower holes.
>
>
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list