Re: [Amc-list] SR-4/T-4 in an American

[Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I don't know, but I can measure...
Yeah it's good.
I ran it before I put the T5 in.
It has the 4-1 first gear in it, so the 2.7 ratio rear would be no sweat.


--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrc II
" Chronic Pain Hurts"

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
> On Fri, 2 May 2008, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> 
> > Is there realy any difference from the external sizing
> > between an SR4 and a T4?
> 
> Is it any good?
> 
> Is the bolt pattern 6.25" between centers, between the top to bolts?
> Is the input shaft 7.0" long from the flat of the case?
> Is the bearing retainer 4.25" diameter?
> (Would be nice if top hole to bottom hole is 5 7/16 same as T-96, but
> it's probably same as T-14, which is about .75" lower.)
> 
> If so, I'll take the thing!
> 
> Shipping will suck.
> 
> 
> > I do not  think either has an O/D.
> 
> Nahh, top = 1.00
> 
> To switch this for the T-96 would require an axle around 2.7:1 to
> keep the same overall ratio. Which in this car, matters. TSM's
> out in the lab, and I'm too lazy to go fetch. Likely the auto
> trans axle is about right.
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list