Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle

From: JOE FULTON <piper_pa20@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 10:41:47 -0800 (PST)

--- Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Couple thoughts hit me real quick.
> 196's don't have the most stable head gaskets as-is,
> so are we talking O-rings and or possibly copper
> gaskets to get even 5 lbs of boost to work?

What about using head studs instead of bolts on a 196?
 Would you not get more even (possibly even elevated)
clamping force with the studs?

Joe Fulton

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle
  - From: Tom Jennings

References:
- Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle
  - From: Wrambler242

Prev by Date: Re: [Amc-list] 'Rear Mount' Turbos - cat scratch fever -
Next by Date: Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle
Previous by thread: Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle
Next by thread: Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated