Nothing like that was available on the American from 58-60. It was "price leader" car, even the top of the line models weren't dressed up that much! The treatment around the pillar areas is reminiscent of the early Nash Rambler "Greenbrier" wagon, but the Nash Rambler was sold as an upscale compact, a "personal" car if you will. The reintroduced 58 model was just the opposite. I don't think even the Greenbrier had the tailgate woodgrain treatment, just the window pillar area. I think there's a photo of one in "The AMC Family Album" (don't you have that on-line?) showing the treatment in the pillar area. Might just be a second color, not woodgrain though -- will have to look. The lower body paint might be original on that car, but the woodgrain is definitely not. I don't think the seller is trying to be deceitful. Often buyers of old cars they aren't that familiar with assume something that looks like it could be original IS original. If they can't find another like it, they just assume it's some rare model. If the car is well restored other than the custom paint, it very likely is worth close to the asking price. Rambler prices, especially the 50s looking cars, have been going up. They have that 50s appeal of more popular models like the tri-five Chevys and 50 Ford, but priced much lower. Since they are more affordable, people start looking to buy them, and the more people look and buy, the higher the pricing will go. I think it will be a good thing in the long run, as more will be saved, but bargain prices for unrestored examples are going to be a thing of the past. That's going to hurt -- it still costs way to much for a professional appearing accurate restoration on these cars, and probably always will. Even as more repro parts are turned out they won't be in the numbers needed to make resto prices drop much. We're in an up swing in the AMC/Rambler market now, and the higher prices will result in more saved, but I think it will be short lived as people discover the difficulty in restoring one and start to shy away from them a bit a few years from now. I could, however, be wrong. Maybe the market will just view it as an alternative to a "real collector car" and not be so fussy about 100% restorations. It's become a prime "resto-rod" car in hot rod circles already -- 50s look, but not valued enough to prevent engine swaps and such. Even though I'm a bit of a hot rodder myself, I hate to see collectible cars so extensively modified that they can't be returned to stock. Even my 63 Classic wagon can be returned to stock with no more scars than a few extra holes -- which can be welded closed so that no one's the wiser. A complete drivetrain would be needed, but it could be done. Hopefully most of the cars will be semi-restored -- engines and such parts that are available restored, but items that aren't adapted from other sources to keep an original look without the worry of 100% originality. That seems to be the case for most, hot rodders the exception. It's just to much work for the average old car lover to do complete engine swaps, and to costly for the budget conscious who are looking at Ramblers because they can't justify the expense of the more popular cars. This is the way I think/hope the collector car market is going as far as AMC/Rambler vehicles. The exception across the board is hot rodders with deep pockets. Almost nothing is untouchable to them. I've even seen a few full Classic Packards resto-rodded. They were basket cases with little more than a salvageable body shell when found, then rodded because of the massive expense to restore. Who cares if it would be a $500,000 car if it takes five years and $300,000 (that you don't have) to get it there? Sure, there's a $200,000 profit -- but remember, you don't have the money for the resto. The same car can be rodded for $100K-$200K (depending on how far you want to go) with some owner work and careful shopping, and be worth at least that much when done. I don't mind seeing cars like the above example resto-rodded. But there are those who look for fully restored (usually an older resto) or very good condition originals to rod. That's a sacrilege! An example is a guy who bought an older restoration of a 39 Lincoln Zephyr a couple years ago. Hot-Rod featured a story on the well done car. The owner wanted a solid car to begin with for his rod project (a reasonable idea under most circumstances). He bought the car careful not to reveal he intended to highly modify it (I wonder if he actually lied to the seller?). When the car was finished (this was a checkbook rod -- took a little over a year), he took it to show the seller. The idiot was surprised when the seller (who restored the car himself) looked at the car, then turned and went back in his house without saying a word. The rodder didn't realize he'd just slapped the guy in the face... no, sucker punched him is more like it. When I was looking for a replacement for my resto-rodded wagon, I passed on 3-4 affordable, well kept or semi-restored Ambassador and Classic wagons. I kept looking until I found one that needed a full resto, yet was solid. There are few enough original and restored cars of ANY AND ALL makes to butcher one for a rod. ------------------------- Date: Wednesday, February 7, 2007 09:00 PM From: mikebailey@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Has anyone ever seen one of these before, or know if this is a "legit" car? I have nine different 1960 sales catalogs, two that are specific to the 1960 Rambler Wagons, and two that are for the 1960 Rambler American, and nowhere is there a picture or a mention of this. I've got 1956 and 1957 brochures that show the larger Rambler Super Cross Country with a woodgrain pattern around the pillar area, but nothing like this... http://rides.webshots.com/album/557506063qxgrLU The same car is on Epage right now for 13 grand: http://epage.com/js/mi/c46295/r649969/2008145.html Just wondering... mike _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list