Re: [AMC-List] Fw: Early amc six MODS wanted
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-List] Fw: Early amc six MODS wanted
- From: Mark Price <markprice242@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2007 16:15:45 -0800
I also think any of the 93-95 Mustang T-5's would be good choices for swaps as they have the longer input to allow room for an adapter. Add an S-10 tailhousing if you want to keep the bench seat
For a beefier automatic the only choice I know of is to get the aluminum Borg from behind a 70-71ish 290 and swap the bell and convertor. I've heard this works, never done it or seen it done. Yo still need ot find a good trans shop to do the work or an old timer. Volvo dealers are the best bet if you can get one of their guys to moonlight you a build.
--
Mark Price
markprice242ATadelphia.net
Morgantown, WV
---- Sandwich Maker <adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> " ----- Original Message -----
> " From: jayson_738@xxxxxxxxxxx
> "
> "
> " Can you point me in the right direction? I have a 1969 Rambler w/ a
> " 199ci I have done a lot of performance mods to this engine. The
> " problem I am having is with the trans its a Borg Warner auto piece of
> " crap. What I would like to do is turn the car into a man trans. The
> " problem with that is the pre-71 engine has limited options for trans
> " that mate with the bell-housing unlike the 72-up. Any suggestions or
> " can you send me in the right direction? Any help would be greatly
> " appreciated.
>
> the bw30 series isn't all that bad if you can find someone who really
> knows transmissions and not just a cookbook wrench-turner. it and
> derivatives were used by companies like jaguar and bmw well up into
> the '80s. aussies beef them and use them behind modified small v8s; i
> have some notes... everything except maybe the valve body should be
> available here.
>
> for the stick, the best stock setup is the t14 3sp used behind 232s
> and 258s, and occasionally 2bbl 290s and 304s, '68-'76. it bolts
> right up in place of the t96, but it's ~2" shorter overall.
>
> some years ago i noodled up an adapter plate that would mount a
> mustang 3.8 ['93-5?] t5 to the pre-'72 bell. my chain of logic is a
> little torturous, but these t5s have a longish input shaft and i came
> to the comclusion that it's ~5/8" longer than the t96/t14 one. aha
> says i, that's just enough for a plate... i haven't actually made one
> though, but i can relate the idea as i have it if you're interested.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay the genius nature
> internet rambler is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> AMC-List mailing list
> AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
> or go to http://www.amc-list.com
_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
or go to http://www.amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin