Re: [AMC-List] Strut Rod Bushings Revisited Ford/AMC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AMC-List] Strut Rod Bushings Revisited Ford/AMC
- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 12:18:33 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 22 Aug 2006, John Elle wrote:
> As the strut rod pivots at the bushing to allow for lower control arm
> movement, does this mean that the pregnant side of the large washers
> face forward, towards the rear or does one face forward and the other
> towards the rear and if so which one. Also which way would the bushing
> install in the hole in the strut rod mount?
> The line drawing on the instruction sheet seems to indicate that the
> installation drawn is the Ford application.
http://wps.com/AMC/Strut-bushing-modern/index.html
It depends on the bushing type. The 63-64 one piece, concave
forward, away from rubber; the bushing was designed to be
deformed sideways.
Most later ones, concave towards rubber, apparently to distribute
force onto maximum cushion area. Also work-heats cheap rubber
and makes them collapse.
Nearly all have the concave-away-from-rubber on the back side. I did
watch cushion deformation on the back side by partially assembling
the lower arm & strut and raising and lowering and watching
everything move.
If it's just a truncated-cone aftermarket bushing, I'd put it
concave-to-rubber in front, concave-away on rear.
_______________________________________________
AMC-List mailing list
AMC-List@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
or go to http://www.amc-list.com
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin