> block 3190808 - 232 CI YEAR 1964-1970 3.8 LITRE, > BORE 3.7500 STROKE 3.5000
> Of course, it makes no sense to me that there would be a re-use of a > number like this: my suspicion is that the source I had for the first > number (which listed 3190808 as a V-8) was in error.
I have a listing of block casting numbers which someone posted to this list in the past, which shows 319 0808 as being both a 232 and a 390, which smells wrong. The kicker though is that this list shows 319 0806 as a 390! I rather suspect a typo or a miss-read is the source of the confusion...