Re: Numbers, any one?

[Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, Gwendolyn Ann Smith wrote:

> I didn't make a typo, but I did look back a second time at the
> information I copied/pasted the above from -- and I found a different use
> of that same number.
>
> block 3190808 - 232 CI YEAR 1964-1970 3.8 LITRE, BORE 3.7500 STROKE 3.5000
>
> Of course, it makes no sense to me that there would be a re-use of a
> number like this: my suspicion is that the source I had for the first
> number (which listed 3190808 as a V-8) was in error.

Aha. Thanks! I was suspecting Matt was right, and I had given you
the casting number instead.

This number makes total sense.


Frank, I will flip the block over and see if I can detect any
sleeving, but I looked at the bottom of the bores before and
didn't notice any oddness.