Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>, you said... >> block 3190808 - 390 CI YEAR 1968-1969 BORE 4.165 > >I trust Gwen made no typos; does anyone have any ideas on why this >3.595" bored six block would have a V8 part number? I didn't make a typo, but I did look back a second time at the information I copied/pasted the above from -- and I found a different use of that same number. block 3190808 - 232 CI YEAR 1964-1970 3.8 LITRE, BORE 3.7500 STROKE 3.5000 Of course, it makes no sense to me that there would be a re-use of a number like this: my suspicion is that the source I had for the first number (which listed 3190808 as a V-8) was in error. Cheers, Gwen Smith ______^_____^______ (O|O) =RAMBLER= (O|O) Gwen Smith * gwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ------------------- www.gwensmith.com/interests/rambler \-<>---|770|---<>-/