I have always been against non-AMC powered cars allowed to beshown at AMC meets. I think that one of the main reasons we all bought AMC's is their great engines.
OK, I can see how this conversation could go... :-) I'll remain civil!
To me, personally, and engine is only one part of the car. And I very much do appreciate AMC engines. And I wasn't talking necessarily about non-AMC motors in AMC cars -- I'm talking about customizations, in general. For example, Mark Rippe's 64 Classic 660 Wagon. It's got an Ambassador 990 V8 (327) driveline; 79 Spirit disk brakes; Vintage Air A/C and heat. It's lowered. Mercedes Benz paint (well, soon :-). It's pretty much "all Rambler". It's not stock.
What class is this car in? If it's top-notch and all Rambler (except A/C and stereo, wheels and tires, etc) does it not count? Clearly it will nto be in the same class as Dewayne Ashmead's spectacular Javelin. That's apples vs. oranges.
If you had a Corvette, do you think the Corvette people would allow a non Chevrolet powered Corvette to be shown at one of their events?
But the Corvette is a not a good example; it is a very special car. A better example would be -- "Chevrolet". ANd I believe -- correct me if I am mistaken -- "stock" classes. I am arguing for the existence of a non-stock, "custom" class. Where a Nova, say, with a Ford engine, would be judged upon other criteria than what the factory produced.
Do you think the related club would allow anything but a Ford powered car in their event? I don't think so.
Finally, as automobile buffs, we are historians who should want to preserve the marque as originally built, or if one would decide to modify the vehicle, I would think you would want to upgrade the powerplant with a more modern version of that company's engine, and "keep it in the family," so to speak.
That is only one aspect of car fandom; one I appreciate, sometimes take part in, and sometimes not. I can only assume I'm not alone.