uumm NVH? Ken Quoting Steve Avery <stoverstevens@xxxxxxxxx>: > The springs themselves and the better ( if memory serves me from when I had > my Eagle with similar, though swapped- leafsabove axle ) clamping is the > superior aspect. That is to say - the spring rate, and clamping points were > worked out to be better than say, a '70 AMX. The rubber "isolators" served > improving the NVH, particularly when you have a fairly stout spring rate. > > Separating the leaves effectively also prevents or reduces stiction > between the individual leafs. The rubber at the clamp is, again, for NVH > reduction, yet the overall clamping methodology located the leaf pack better > on the perch. > > Steve > > Ken Ames <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx> > > >"The rear isoclamp assembly, another big (and relatively cheap) > improvement," > > > >I've never been able to figure how putting squishy rubber bits between the > >spring and the axle was a good idea for handling. The car would be quieter, > but > >I can't see how it would help otherwise. One day I'll try a car without > those > >bits in and see what happens. > > > Hmmm... Maybe I'll try that first when I re-assemble. > > -- M > -------------- next part -------------- > An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > URL: > <http://list.amc-list.com/pipermail/amc-list-amc-list.com/attachments/20110413/ad119745/attachment.htm> > _______________________________________________ > AMC-list mailing list > AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com > _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com