That sounds much more likely than a Pacer-only block. : ) Ken Quoting Glen Hoag <hoag@xxxxxxxxxx>: > It wasn't that the block was a one-off, but Pacer had unique motor > mount brackets and mounts. IIRC, there is at least one new motor > mount boss on the 1975-up block to accommodate the Pacer brackets, so > in that regard, the Pacer block was different, but once changed, the > same block was used on everything until the next change, which I > think was for the Eagle front axle mount. I think that extra boss is > where the knock sensor wound up on the 4.0 block. > > AMC's "1975 Car Service Highlights" booklet (Pub A751001A), which was > part of an annual series for mechanics to let them know the major > changes from the prior year, says that the new accessory arrangement > lowered the engine profile by three inches. (p 30) Since Pacer was > not yet introduced when this publication was released, no mention of > it appears, and it isn't immediately obvious as to why the lower > profile was necessary. The water pump was also redesigned for 1975. > (p 32) The new accessory arrangement, while necessary for Pacer, was > used on all 1975-up AMC cars. > > --Glen > > At 08:21 AM 3/10/2011, you wrote: > >Seems like a odd thing to spend $40 million on development and > >production of the Pacer which shared few parts with anything else > >AMC too....just a couple years before AMC had spent $40 million > >buying Jeep from Willys you know. > > > >So AMC got away from mode that made them > >successful.....interchangability of parts.......in the 60s, and much > >spent for glass, sheetmetal, dies, pressing, molds, rather endless > >here of what things unique as the Pacer itself. And Matador coupes. > >And Marlin lessons not learned before them. > > > >Not knock on Pacer, Matty coupes or Marlin, it is just that AMC was > >top of game with getting away with 'new' models with cosmetic > >changes. How many of you remember AMC mentioning that "they were > >going to introduce a NEW model every SIX months" in 1970? > > > >By 1971......you had 3 different Gremlins; 7 different Hornets; 3 > >different Matadors; 3 different Javelins; and count them.....7 > >different Ambassador series. Total *23* models to choos from in your > >nearest AMC dealership. Easy as looking at back of your NOS 1971 > >full line color catalog and see choices! So subtle and not so subtle > >changes made a new model for AMC...easy as 'base' to 'DPL' to 'SST' > >for instance. > > > >For all customers price ranges. That was marketing genius in my > >humble opinion, sort of what you see companies doing now, making > >smaller cereal boxes, or concave bottom of glass jar of peanut > >butter......looks same, costs same at store, just uh, getting LESS > >product. New & Improved! That's the Spirit Thing, lend a hand! As > >Gomez would say....... > > > >$40 million. I could hang with Charlie Sheen for a night in Veags > >and his girls with that. > >Eddie Stakes > >713.464.8825 > >eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >www.planethoustonamx.com > > > >----- Original Message ----- From: "Ken Ames" <ameskg@xxxxxxxxx> > >To: "Eddie Stakes" <eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "AMC, > >Rambler, Nash, Jeep and family" <amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2011 1:50 AM > >Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Pacer in CO Springs /pacer motor mounts oddities > > > > > >>Seems like an odd thing for AMC to do - have a special block for one > model. > >> > >>Ken > >> > >> > >>Quoting Eddie Stakes <eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> > >>>Glen Hoag mentioned of the Pacer in CO here: > >>> > >>>http://denver.craigslist.org/ctd/2234564950.html > >>> > >>>"I'm fairly certain that the 1974 and earlier blocks will not fit the > Pacer. > >>>Attachment > >>>points for the motor mount brackets to the block may also have changed." > >>> > >>>I had hell of a time finding a Pacer six years ago for my custom woodie > >>>wagon, I could get > >>>regular old 232 and 258 at pick a parts for $89 whole engine, but none of > >>>them would fit > >>>as the motor mounts were totally different for Pacer. So had to find a > Pacer > >>>to > >>>cannibalize for drivetrain. A 258 is a 258 and 232 is 232 until it is in > a > >>>Pacer, they sat > >>>in at odd angle, was not motor mounts, was the actual block mounting was > >>>different. So > >>>bought whole Pacer and pulled drivetrain for my woodie wagon > >>> > >>>http://www.planethoustonamx.com/stuff/pacer-commercial.htm > >>> > >>>and parted out rest years ago. > >>> > >>>Eddie Stakes > >>>713.464.8825 > >>>eddiestakes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>www.planethoustonamx.com > >>> > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>AMC-list mailing list > >>>AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com > >> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >AMC-list mailing list > >AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com > > _______________________________________________ > AMC-list mailing list > AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com > _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com