" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " Matt Haas wrote: " > Tom, " > " > The T-14 is a much, much beefier transmission. It is also physically " > bigger (and heavier) than the T-96. The easiest way to tell the two " > apart is to look at the case. The T-96 has "T-96" (followed by a letter) " > cast into it and the T-14 has "T-14" cast into it. " " Oh yeah, I have one of 'em too. It's bigger, but not night and day " different, like the T-150. " " Check out T-14 vs. T-96 in an exploded diagram -- same pocket bearings " between the inpunt and output, same case layout, same countershaft " almost, same bearing setup, and I can tell you, I did the side-by-side, " you could machine the T-14 to attach a T-96 R10 adapter to it! (You'd " need an OD T-14 output shaft). have you compared the t14 to a t86? just from a cursory look they seem to be much closer to each other than the t96. and not surprising that multiple warner families would share design elements... ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list