Re: [Amc-list] Bigger brakes on 232 vs 196 for 65 American?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Bigger brakes on 232 vs 196 for 65 American?
- From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 12:55:26 -0500
Think about it Tom! The 232 has a good bit more power than the 196. More towing/hauling capacity and speed potential means you need better brakes! A common mistake among novice hot rodders is to stick a big engine in a little car with stock brakes... need I say more?
-------------------------
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 11:03:56 -0500 (EST)
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
"
"
"
" The 232 car got Bendix 9x2.5, the 195.6 got Wagner 9x2. That makes no sense
" to me as the two cars have got to be the same weight, or maybe the 195.6
" heavier!
i don't recall where i saw it - amc/rc docs maybe? - but iirc the '65
196 220 was 2640lb shipping weight; the '66 199 220, 2625.
--
Frank Swygert
Publisher, "American Motors Cars"
Magazine (AMC)
For all AMC enthusiasts
http://farna.home.att.net/AMC.html
(free download available!)
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin