Yeah, probably someone went, "Hey, if we're pumping this stuff around and it keeps the engine running, why don't we filter it better"??? Well, duh. Or, hey it's the last year, lets fix it before we kill it! Kind of like Sadam, clean him, take care of him, then hang him.... -- Mark Price Morgantown, WV 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 " I was different before people dared to be different" -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> > On Tuesday 31 July 2007 18:27:18 Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > I knew that would peak your interest! > > Hell yeah! It looks like the weak point for long-term reliability with this > motor could be solved. It's odd they bothered to add it to the last year's > motors. It probably "fell out" of the 232 design/deploy phase; the aluminum > 195.6 apparently shares valve train components with the 232 (you can probably > drop 4.0 lifters in it!) > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list