RE: Matador 4.0

[<mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Here's you torque comparison.
87-95 4.0L 220 ft lb @ 4000 rpm
74 258 1 bbl 195 @ 2000 rpm
304 2bbl 245 @ 2500
360 2 bbl 285 @ 2400
360 4 bbl 295 @ 2900
360 4 bbl dual exhaust 315 @ 3100
401 4 bbl dual eshaust 345 @ 3300
Fresh fuel for the fire, You guys figure out what's real!


Mark Price
mprice@xxxxxxxxxx
Morgantown, WV
69 AMC rambler, 4.0L, EFI, 5 speed 
65 Ambassador Conv, 327 AUTO, Basketcase
65 Ambassador 990H flood victim parts car!
01 S-10 CREWCRAP 4X4



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "amckiwi" <amckiwi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: mail-From-mprice-westco.net@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date:  Sat, 3 Sep 2005 19:22:07 +1000

>Good point
>
>I would like to see torque comparisons I reckon the 4L will loose out in
>that compare not a real issue once moving but getting you there likely to be
>quicker in the V8
>
> 
>
>I wonder how much better it will handle with the 4L must be a bit lighter
>over the front end anybody hazard a guess
>
> 
>
>Stu 
>
>Melbourne
>
>Australia
>
>Where it is officially spring yea ha
>
> 
>