Re: [BaadAssGremlins] eagle question for MR. ROSA

[Onree <onree@xxxx>]

I have a friend with a 1983 SX/4 that he says he bought brand new in March
of 1984 as a leftover model. They must have been slow sellers by that point.

Onree


on 9/2/04 4:01 PM, John W Rosa at JohnRosa@xxxx did write:

> 
> Paul,
> 
> I don't have production numbers handy, but 2200 doesn't
> sound blatantly high or low. '83 was the final year for
> all 2WD AMCs (Spirit and Concord)- only Eagle continued
> in 1984. To further trim the model line, since the Spirit
> was dead, the SX/4, which shared the same liftback body,
> was killed with it. All that remained were Eagle sedans
> and wagons after 1983.
> 
> John 'Mr.' Rosa
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nice_guy_1952 [mailto:nice_guy_1952@xxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, September 02, 2004 3:25 PM
> To: BaadAssGremlins@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [BaadAssGremlins] eagle question for MR. ROSA
> 
> 
> HI THERE.. i just resently bought a near mint 1983 sx/4 eagle from
> the original owner. the car is loaded with every option available and
> comes with every pieces of documentation since new .including the
> bill of sale from the amc dealer .NOW . the owner claims that 1983
> was the last year of production for those sx/4 with a production no.
> of around 2200 .is there anyway to verify those claims .i love the
> eagle and now have 5 of them . but i am in no way a expert or a
> autority on them i just like the look.. the way they drive and the
> attention we get wile driving them . we also have a 1968 javelin sst
> and a 1968 amx 390 and at cruise night we usually park one eagle and
> the javelin or amx side by side . and the eagles are peoples magnet
> wile nobody ardly pays any attention to the amx (go figure )but
> anyway i would love if yoursel or anyone could shed some light on
> those claims above . thanks.. yours truly PAUL . P.S .if i was
> closer i would get those 2 eagles you have on e-bay .not even 1 bid
> what a shame