Re: [AMC-list] early 232 using 258 intake??

[Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx>]

Having a 232 in a 68-70 does not automatically mean it has a T-14. The 
T-14 was optional. I suspect that you're more likely to find it in 
something other than an American.

Matt

On 9/30/2011 4:50 PM, Sandwich Maker spouted this sage advice:
> " On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:57 PM, tom jennings<tomj@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
> ">  On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Matt Haas<mhaas@xxxxxxx>  wrote:
> ">
> ">>  I would not to expect long life from the T-96. Even the later "beefed up"
> ">>  version (T-96J) is spindly compared to the T-14 that replaced it. These
> ">>  trannies just don't last long behind the later sixes.
>
> the t14 is much beefier [enough for 2bbl 290s and 304s] and it does
> have better synchros, but for me the win is synchro 1st - makes
> stop-and-go -much- more pleasant!
>
> bruce - '68-'70 americans and javelins with 232 have the t14 and
> driveshaft you'd need, and while you can't use the jav rear [too wide],
> any '66-9 non-big-nut m15 american rear will do.

--
mhaas@xxxxxxx
Cincinnati, OH
http://www.mattsoldcars.com
1967 Rambler American wagon
1968 Rambler American sedan
=================================================================
According to a February 2003 survey of Internet holdouts released
by UCLA's Center for Communication Policy, people cite
not having a computer as the No. 1 reason they won't go online.
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com