Re: [AMC-list] The 232/258 puzzle

[Wrambler <wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

The early, pre tall deck 232 rods are the correct rods
to mate up with a 258 Crank in a tall deck block.
I have a full set of 73 258 rods if you need them.
I was saving them for my stroker project, but doubt I
will ever build it.

I also still have a set in my 69 232 in the shed I can fall back to.

73 258 crank I have is #3214723


Mark Price
Morgantown, WV 26508
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
"I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens!"

----- Original Message -----

> From: "Joe Fulton" <piper_pa20@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Sunday, January 30, 2011 1:00:15 PM
> Subject: [AMC-list] The 232/258 puzzle
> 
> I have a freshly machined crankshaft which has been sitting for
> several years.  
> The machine shop put 258 on the end but I think it was a 232 crank and
> I never 
> bothered to correct their error.  Is there a casting number I can
> check or how 
> can I, with little chance of error, measure the stroke?
> 
> I also have two 232 blocks, one freshly machined with an oversize bore
> (0.030 I 
> think).   If the crank above is a 258 crank I assume I can use either
> of those 
> blocks (both are post-1972 motors).   What rods will I need?  I have a
> 199 that 
> I haven't torn down yet.  Will 199 rods work with the crank above?  
> What 
> pistons?
> 
> Thanks,
> Joe Fulton
> _______________________________________________
> AMC-list mailing list
> AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com