Re: [AMC-list] Six Cylinder Balancers

[Joe Fulton <piper_pa20@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Frank.  That's what I needed to know.  You too Marc.

Joe Fulton



----- Original Message ----
From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Sun, January 2, 2011 12:09:35 PM
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Six Cylinder Balancers

As long as you're talking about 199/232/258/4.0L engines the balancers should 
interchange. The only caveat I know of is that the 4.0L and 87-89 258 crank 
snout is ~0.33" shorter than an earlier crank. Either the earlier crank needs to 
be shortened or a spacer used to push the balancer back further. I'm using a 
4.0L balancer on a 74 258 crank... or rather was. 10 years and 60K miles with no 
problems.
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com