Re: [AMC-list] Safety Weinie

[wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I don't buy the idea a rag joint would make much difference any way. Those things are tough and they have locating pins that would just lock tighter as the box is driven rear ward. 
   Best bet in my mind is the collapsing double d section. That's why I picked up the intermediate shaft from the ZJ to go with ZJ box going in the vert. I have the true 65 tilt column, not changing that out. Just hoping the massive length of the front frames on the 65 will do. 
   That and hope to never NEED it.
------Original Message------
From: Matt Haas
Sender: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To: AMC, Rambler, Nash, Jeep and family
ReplyTo: AMC, Rambler, Nash, Jeep and family
Subject: Re: [AMC-list] Safety Weinie
Sent: Dec 20, 2009 5:22 PM

This is not right. The 66 Rebel I had for sure had the spear-O-death 
column in it. The power steering cars that year did have a rag joint but 
this car was a manual steering car.

Matt

On 12/20/2009 9:27 AM, Frank Swygert spouted this sage advice:
> ALL 1966+ cars have the rag joint. 65 was the last year for the long 
> shaft steering box.
-- 
mhaas@xxxxxxx
Cincinnati, OH
http://www.mattsoldcars.com
1967 Rambler American wagon
1968 Rambler American sedan
=================================================================
According to a February 2003 survey of Internet holdouts released
by UCLA's Center for Communication Policy, people cite
not having a computer as the No. 1 reason they won't go online.
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com


Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from U.S. Cellular
_______________________________________________
AMC-list mailing list
AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com