What length are 196 and or 327 rods? Maybe something there? The 199 crank sure would keep the piston "up in the bore"! I know we talked about this years ago on the strokers forum. I'd search for it , but I get tired of Yahoos crap. Everytime I get my login fixed it works for 2-3 weeks and craps out again! Takes me hours to get it working to... -- Mark Price Morgantown, WV 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II " I realize that death is inevitable. I just don't want to be around when it happens! " -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker) > " From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> > " > " Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > " > Hey Tom, > " > and others, I found his photbucket pics, WAY COOL!!! > " > > " > http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e100/Ramblinon6/ > " > > " > So awesome, wonder where it lives... > " > " Alton IL > " > " > " Yeah, nice work!! Same guy suggested the 199 crank in a 4.0 block, to > " get the bigger bore... now that would be an odd engine, no!? He says he > " revs his 258 to 6000 no problem. > > 199 rods are the same length as 4.0 rods... to get zero deck height, > you'd need slugs with ~2.1" pin height! 6.375" rods with stock slugs. > > otoh you could plausibly run 7.125" custom rods and 1.1" pin height. > > there oughta be a formula that sets pin height to minimize rotating > mass inertia... > ________________________________________________________________________ > Andrew Hay the genius nature > internet rambler is to see what all have seen > adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list