Re: [Amc-list] check torque vs. retorque

From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 20:56:54 -0800

-- Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> With the 196, I think 30's technology is just about right.

That's kinda what I was poking fun of :-) It's more 40's I suppose, as 
Frank's lineage in A/M/C shows. Which is one of the reasons I like this 
motor; it's a modern-ish antique engine, not much for HP but fun to drive 
and (so far...) work on.

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

References:
- [Amc-list] check torque vs. retorque
  - From: Tom Jennings
- Re: [Amc-list] check torque vs. retorque
  - From: Matt Haas

Prev by Date: Re: [Amc-list] The 'Turbo' Life Cycle (196 turbo?)
Next by Date: Re: [Amc-list] Puff the magic Rambler?
Previous by thread: Re: [Amc-list] check torque vs. retorque
Next by thread: Re: [Amc-list] check torque vs. retorque
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin

This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated