Re: [Amc-list] Pearly Whites

[Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I never knew what possesed them to even install the 2.8.
I moved heaven and earth anytime I heard anyone I knew was shopping for an XJ.
 I always said drive them both and don't pretend the 2.8 actually runs better cause it don't! I talked more then a few people down to the 2.5 four. The only difference between the two in actual driving was the 6 was a bit smoother running.

--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
" I was different before people dared to be different" 

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
> " From: Frank Swygert <farna@xxxxxxx>
> " 
> " 
> " Andrew Hay wrote:
> " given the lead time to develop and tool up the 4.0, it must've been
> " under way long before mopar stepped in.  if it hadn't, we'd probably
> " have gotten the dakota 3.9 instead.
> " 
> " I don't know where that comment came from!
> 
> jim's comment that the 2.8 was replaced when 'der mopar' took over.
> it was [a year earlier actually iirc], but not cause-and-effect.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay                                  the genius nature
> internet rambler                            is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list