Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators



Bulk buy ends on the 31st, if you look at the site all the info is
there. 


~John 

-----Original Message-----
From: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Joe
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2007 4:08 PM
To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jgray_55@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Amc-list] AMC aluminum radiators

HI. I need to look back thru my emails...BUT. Anyone know if the
radiators have shipped yet?? I ordered one for my V8(401) Gremlin.I paid
awhile back before production of them. I have TONS of emails to go thru
to locate the exact one i need. Thanks alot,Joe
--- amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

> Send Amc-list mailing list submissions to
> 	amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	amc-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	amc-list-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of Amc-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Sins (Archimedes)
>    2. Re: Sins (Archimedes)
>    3. Re: Trademarks (Archimedes)
>    4. fwd performance some more (Andrew Blomer)
>    5. Re: Sins (JOE FULTON)
>    6. Re: Sins (JOE FULTON)
>    7. Re: Sins (Sandwich Maker)
>    8. Re: Sins (Sandwich Maker)
>    9. Trademarks (Don Johnson)
>   10. How bad do cars rust in South Dakota? (Brian
> Seeley)
>   11. Re: How bad do cars rust in South Dakota?
>       (Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx)
>   12. Re: How bad do cars rust in South Dakota?
> (Widiker, John D)
>   13. Thanks... (Keleigh Hardie)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:31:24 -0400
> From: Archimedes <Freedom@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Sins
> To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <5.1.0.14.1.20070323090035.01f34258@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> 
> 
> John Mahoney postulates:
> 
> 
> >NUMMI, NAFTA, and NASA are not to blame: our
> schools, our teachers, our
> >kids, -ourselves- are.  Life got too easy, we got
> too confident; we got
> >too comfortable being the Americans that everyone
> else wanted to be
> >too.  Everyone else worked toward where we were,
> and then kept right on
> >going.  That's why GM and Ford and Chrysler and
> American Motors can't get
> >ahead.  Or why one of them --- two of them? ---
> three of them? --- now are
> >dead.
> 
> 
> They're all either dead or on life support because Americans don't 
> seem to understand that we're not ina  battle for whatever riches we 
> can win today, and to heck with tomorrow -- we're in a battle to be 
> economically alive tomorrow.
> 
> When Executives, Managers, and line workers start to understand that 
> multimillion dollar salaries and $50 per hour wages and cushy 
> pensions-for-life for assembly line work were an anomaly and cannot be

> supported indefinitely, maybe attitudes will change.
>  But I doubt it.  It
> seems like the entire culture is unwilling to get off the "give me 
> every dime I want, or the factory can "Go To ....".
> 
> Why would $50 per hour workers rather see their factory close, than 
> accept
> $25 per hour?  Why would executives want to see their livilihoods 
> become the plaything of Chinese state bureaucrats?
> 
> If there is less demand for your product, YOU HAVE TO REDUCE THE PRICE

> until demand matches your supply.  Right now, there is less and less 
> demand for American labor because its price is way too high, at every 
> level -- worker, middle, and executive.
> 
> I keep seeing these sites with photos of all the dead factories in the

> industrial belt.  I earn a lot less than auto workers do.  I would 
> enjoy factory work for my current pay (did it before).
> Why am I prevented from
> selling my work to an auto factory for my current rate if I so choose?
> 
> 
> >Speaking of assembled cars, try this:  Did
> Studebaker or AMC build any?
> 
> 
> Sure, the AMGeneral Metro Bus:
> 
>          http://www.omot.org/roster/buses/amg.html
> 
> In all seriousness, AMC did build the last of the Diplomat/LeBaron 
> line.  Does that qualify?
> 
> In addition, a lot of the later frankish metal was mostly assembled 
> from parts made in France or otherwise sourced from Renault.  The 
> Premier engines, for example, were Puegeot(sp?)-Renault-Volvo...  The 
> Healey was made in Britain so that doesn't qualify...  And so was the 
> Met.
> 
> Or do you mean a stand-alone line of cars that they built under their 
> own brand name, but built entirely from off-the-shelf parts from 
> outside manufacturers?  If that's what you mean, I don't have a clue.
> 
> Did I get the no-prize?
> 
> -- Marc
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:39:18 -0400
> From: Archimedes <Freedom@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Sins
> To: amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <5.1.0.14.1.20070323093608.01f0ca70@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
> 
> 
> >"Look what a 2007
> >" American luxury station wagon has become. 
> Overpriced, oversized,
> >" overweight, or overdone?"  That SportCombi was
> almost as new, with a
> >" hunkered-down style and a matte trim my old Sport
> had had, but it
> >" still looked so much like an Eagle that I sighed.
>  "Look what a 2007
> >" car can be when it's not American.  Shapely,
> stylish, refined,
> >" powerful, and economical."
> >"
> >" And it's built by GM.  Not in America.  How come
> that can happen?  Huh?
> >
> >it's built by gm only technically, because they
> bought the company.
> >saab was building sylish, refined, etc cars
> 
> 
> And unreliable...
> 
> 
> >long before the general
> >showed up with his wallet - and they were for sale
> because their
> >profit margin was vanishing.  supposedly gm still
> loses money on
> >saabs.
> 
> 
> Because they are unreliable, *and* because all employees (workers and
> management) in the division are grossly overpaid.
> 
> GM motors would have done wonders in those crates, at least as far as 
> reliablity is concerned.
> 
> 
> 
=== message truncated ===



 
________________________________________________________________________
____________
Never miss an email again!
Yahoo! Toolbar alerts you the instant new Mail arrives.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/mail/
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list


Home Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin 


This site contains affiliate links for which we may be compensated