Re: [Amc-list] Radiators

[Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>]

On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Mark Price wrote:

> No real reason other than the reduced height would allow less expansion room at the top of the rad. requiring a recovery system to allow for expansion and contraction. Drag rules call for a catch can, but I would think the low tank rad would need a true recovery system.

It seems inappropriate to not have one anyways, except for
showable originals. Who wants to have to refill a radiator all
the time? That juice is expensive! I'd bet those buying a fancy
radiator have already added one. They're only 10 bucks.
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.amc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/amc-list