" From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx> " " " The T-96 is a very weak transmission. I sheared teeth off of a " newly-built T-96 with a 232 in my '63 Classic wagon, cresting a very " steep hill. I was in gear, not clutching, and teeth went pop-pop-pop " from straight-up torque. that sounds a -little- extreme... wasn't it the base tranny in 232 ambos about '69, and 258 hornets in '71? but perhaps those combos were strictly for the purpose of pricing optional drivetrains and not intended to actually be ordered. " It's sized for a 196 in an early American and nothing more. the earliest app i know of is the '46 cj2, even lighter and lower powered than the nash rambler. besides amc, it was also used in the 170-cube stude lark. early/mid '60s 144/170/200 falcons et al had a '2.77' tranny that sure looks like a t-96... i don't know of others. i keep wondering how hard it would be to modify a t-14 for the torque tube driveshaft. suppose you start with a car t-14, but replace the tailshaft housing with a 4wd jeep t-14 one. then machine a block with the t/c bolt pattern on one side and the rubber tt coupling pattern on the other. maybe it could also have the tranny mount on the bottom. the mainshaft is still ~2" shorter than the t-96 one, but if the tt u-joints are the '65-'70 open-drive 232 ones and not the tiny 'big nut driveshaft' ones, then '73-6 fine-spline mainshaft with the early/mid '70s '7"' yoke would work, as it does replacing a t-96 on my '68 american. a tranny with o/d could be trickier. i'm under the impression - perhaps wrongly - that each amc tranny-o/d combo has its own output shaft and housing. that makes more parts to replicate, to copy the factory setup. i've also been told that the stock - and afaik rare - t14-o/d is exactly the same length as a non-o/d t-96. if a setup could be found, those parts could be duplicated... ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought