" From: <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxx> " " I'll second that a 4.0L cam would likely be an excellent cam to drop in a 232. " Make sure you spec a 99 or earlier Cam though as they changed the Timing chain " setup in 2,000. If the parts books list any difference in years I would get " one for a 1987-1990 4.0L. " " Originally there was a rumour that these cams had a slightly different ramp " profile and are a little better than the 1990 up cams. Now It seem that either " this was never or true or misinformation, or they have replaced the early " cams numbers with the later cams as there is very little difference. I thought " the ramp angle was changed slightly to help quiet the cam and help them pass " emissions without air pumps, but this is all unfounded ramblings of a mad man " at this point. have you seen http://www.angelfire.com/my/fan/Jeep4.0Camshafts.htm ? this is part of dino savva's site and he generally knows what he's talking about. i will say i think his pre-'80 cam info isn't clear or complete. perhaps the rumors you're thinking of were that the '91-5 ho cam was retarded a few degrees from the '87-'90 renix setup. this is still murky to me. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought