Re: the Navarro Rambler Six...

[farna@xxxxxxx]

Yeah, but you were running a little T-96 three speed. The T-96J has a slightly larger input shaft and bearing, and was used behind the 232 in small cars, but it didn't last long behind a stock 4.0L either. Well, let me correct that -- the synchronizer didn't last long. The rest of the trans is still in good shape, just looks like it has 40-50K on it instead of 20-25K. 

On November 16, 2005 amckiwi wrote:

> I would be more concerned about the torque being produced by the motor rather
> than the HP
> 
> My 232 killed many more Rambler gear boxes than the 196 did :(
> 
> Stu
> Melbourne
> Australia
> 


=============================================================
Posted by wixList Archiver -- http://www.amxfiles.com/wixlist