" From: farna@xxxxxxx " " On November 15, 2005 Mark Price wrote: " " > I wonder how long a Renault Lecar or 18i based transaxle would hold up? " " Yes, but small engines. One thing people are forgetting -- this is the " 550 hp prototype Indy engine! Size won't matter (it's less than 199, by " the way, the 199 block is sleeved down). Tom may de-tune it some if " he's actually planning on driving it (less boost, maybe?), but " "detuned" to 400 hp is still a lot more than a 199! Even considering " the 400 (and 550) ratings are gross, net would still be around 340-360 " (detuned to 400 gross first -- or around 500 if not detuned). i hadn't forgotten - that's why my first thought was for the porsche. recent '911' engines are -very-potent-. if they can reach production standards of reliability with ~400hp in a 3200lb+ car... " Mark, that's why I was suggesting the ZF auto behind the 3.0L Premier. " Auto, and tougher than something like the 18i, which had a 2.2L max. " I'm not sure if the turbo version (not sold in the US, IIRC) used the " same transaxle or not. Or a Chrysler LHS transaxle (in auto). Making it " an auto would greatly simplify shift linkage and should last longer " since the torque converter "cushions" the shock to the rear wheels and " trans guts. No clutch linkage either! yeah, but the turbo 199 is still way over their heads. take a look at http://www.fiberfab.us/transaxles.html though... " The Corvair can be "flipped". I've seen the Corvair transaxle in mid " engine sand rails with SBC bolted to them. The trans case and diff are " separate units. It's made very much like the VW pieces, at least the " diff and manual trans. i was remembering that too, but not clearly. iirc folks have made sports car kits [kellison?] based around 'vair transaxles with sbcs. i've just doublechecked - the late, full-irs transaxle had the same innards as the 4sp used with 283s. that's only half way to the power of the turbo 199, but in a fullsize car. and it's a low-cost start... the 'regular' pg was used behind even bigger v8s. the corvair ring&pinion are starting to look like the weak links. otoh the kit folks don't seem to have any trouble with fairly warmed-over v8s. " The auto transaxle used in the Pontiac Tempest is actually a power " glide two speed (I had one). It was also used with 326 V-8 as well " asthe "half a 389" (194.5) four. The torque converter in the Poncho is " still on the same end of the trans as it would be with a Corvair " engine. It's really weird -- the torque converter case hangs off the " back of the trans in the open air, and rotates, thus is air cooled (no " coolant lines to radiator). There is no bell housing on the front end " (torward the engine), just a mount for the torque tube. So it can't be " used. A true Corvair auto could be, since the ring gear and carrier " just change sides. As noted above, it has the SBC bolt pattern also. yup, the corvair too, and the pg - still popular in drag racing - can be built for a lot of hp. i hadn't known that the early unibody tempests ['61-3 only, iirc] were also available with v8s. they were really little cars for america - the size of the corvair, remember! they would've been -very-fast- with a 326, and -very-nose-heavy- too, as the 326 was essentially a low-deck 421/428/455, rather bigger than a sbc never mind a buick 300, let alone a 215. the '64-up tempest - and skylark - were midsize body-on-frame cars shared with the chevelle. that was the platform the gto sprang from. ________________________________________________________________________ Andrew Hay the genius nature internet rambler is to see what all have seen adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought