Re: Mercedes question
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercedes question
- From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
- Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 09:47:04 -0400 (EDT)
" From: Matt Haas <mhaas@xxxxxxx>
"
" Fuel efficiency is why they're going with large numbers of gears in
" automatic transmissions. The goal is to keep the engine at peak efficiency
" as much as possible (which makes me wonder why CVT transmissions haven't
" caught on).
belt/pulley cvts are very hard to engineer for capacity, and if the
belts are rubber, for efficiency. i don't know about hydrostatic
transmissions except they require extremely tight tolerances, and that
means expense - and then there's the plumbing, and maintenance.
electric transmisison has potential, especially in combination with
batteries, but i think weight is still a problem.
hydrostatic and electric do have interesting possibilities for all
wheel drive.
________________________________________________________________________
Andrew Hay the genius nature
internet rambler is to see what all have seen
adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx and think what none thought
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin