I have 9 232 crank casting numbers and 5 258 crank casting numbers. Send me/post the number from yours and I'll see if it's on the list. My list was made from various sources, but I still occasionally find a different number. There are two different deck height 232s. 64-70 is short deck, 71-89 tall deck is about 1/8" taller. The tall deck 232 uses the 232 stroke crank and the same length rods as a 199. There are only two rod lengths: '64-'71: 199 - 6.125" 232 - 5.875" '72-'06: 232 - 6.125" 242/4.0 - 6.125" 258/4.2 - 5.875"Piston pin height is the same on 199/232. 258 and 4.0L have different pin heights from the 199/232 and each other. IIRC the early and late 232 pin height is the same, but dish size depends on year (head chamber size and compression).
The 199 uses a flat top piston to make up for compression loss due to reduced stroke from the 232. 199 pistons are hard to find, but would add at least a full point of compression to a 232... I seem to recall someone saying it would boost compression to around 9.5:1. ------------ Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:00:15 -0800 (PST) From: Joe Fulton<piper_pa20@xxxxxxxxxxx> I have a freshly machined crankshaft which has been sitting for several years.? The machine shop put 258 on the end but I think it was a 232 crank and I never bothered to correct their error.? Is there a casting number I can check or how can I, with little chance of error, measure the stroke? I also have two 232 blocks, one freshly machined with an oversize bore (0.030 I think).?? If the crank above is a 258 crank I assume I can use either of those blocks (both are post-1972 motors).?? What rods will I need?? I have a 199 that I haven't torn down yet.? Will 199 rods work with the crank above??? What pistons? -- Frank Swygert Publisher, "American Motors Cars" Magazine (AMC) For all AMC enthusiasts http://www.amc-mag.com (free download available!) _______________________________________________ AMC-list mailing list AMC-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://list.amc-list.com/listinfo.cgi/amc-list-amc-list.com