Re: [Amc-list] Water line in six cyl. intake
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Amc-list] Water line in six cyl. intake
- From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2009 18:03:58 -0800
Yeah, the little motor barely breathes and CFMs, it's hardly touchy
about carbs as long as low velocity mixture is good. I swear the 2bbl is
just for marketing.
Frank had a nice dual carb setup on his, he said no real difference. I
meam let's be real -- at 60mph in 3rd-over it's pumping 96cfm maximum!
That's not even half the flow rate of a Carter YF! It's like a big
lawnmower, if it weighed 600 lbs.
Maybe I should try the one bbl...
Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> That's a question only answered by trial and error.
> Course you knew that :)
>
> I've driven single barrels and dual throat 196's.
> I do not recall and earth shattering difference in power.
>
> The cars were so dissimilar I have not idea on mpg!
>
> I'd hazard you may see another 1/2 mpg up to 2 at the outside max and that would be with very careful tuning and driving on your part.
>
> You may see a slight boost in grunt, but with that open intake design and the long stroke you may see nothing!
>
> --
> Mark Price
> Morgantown, WV
> 1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
> 2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
> " I realize that death is inevitable.
> I just don't want to be around when it happens! "
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
> From: Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>
>>> I've seen some day and night differences between heated-nonheated six intakes.
>>> They could have tuned around the not water heated intakes issues with a little
>> more fuel, slower choke etc.
>>> It could have been the light bulb moment years too!
>>> All the years of not heating the intake, then the light comes on! Oh, wait
>> this works better and uses less gas!
>>
>> So I wonder how much power really I'd lose on the 195.6 going from 2bbl
>> to 1bbl to get the heated manifold... this is my commutermobile, and
>> another mpg or two would be great. Pushing MPG is a big project for me
>> on this car, at 26 mpg highway it's already pretty good.
>> _______________________________________________
>> Amc-list mailing list
>> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
Back to the Home of the AMC Gremlin