This car doesn't have an ammeter then? Ken Quoting Tom Jennings <tomj@xxxxxxx>: > > Matt Haas wrote: > > > You may want to check out some of the hot rod parts places. I know I've > > seen ads for alternators that are built inside of generator housings. > > Also, I think the alternators GM used before the 10si are lower output > > but those are also use external regulators. > > Yeh, those hot rod alternators are nice! Pricey though, and the > contrarian in me likes the generator. I think the up-high mount for an > ordinary GM alt is the way to go for us without PS and A/C. > > > So it looks like with the higher idle, and seriously cleaned up > contacts, the generator is again adequate to the task. Just adequate. It > again points out to me two things: one, how inter-linked and touchy this > old tech is; everything is open-loop and if the battery is not charging > right? it's the driver that has to figure it out! Modern cars have > better parts (alternators!) and better systems (fewer interconnects in > critical parts, computer management of idle speed). > > But, two, if you have the gumption to constantly monitor, diagnose, > prevent, fix, you can get this old crap pretty damn reliable. My > drop-dead measure is, how many times I've been stranded in any way by > the car. I don't count scheduled downtime like normal trans rebuild or > whatever. THe 63 classic wagon, not once in a decade or more. I had a > few failures in the first couple of years with it (ignition wiring > problem, LPG filler valve stuck, probably one or two more, that were all > due to my changes or old parts not yet repaired. In 1996 an axle half > parted; old bad forging, 2000 or so (vacuum) wiper motor failed on a New > Mexico road trip (disassembly in parking lot!). This year, ran out of > LPG when the tank level sender stuck at 1/4. That's it. Problems yes, > but inconveniences like heater valve not opening. > > The American is still in the initial shake-down phase as I look at it. > If I continue to have problems with the generator that I can't > lifestyle-change around, I'll find a way to stick an alternator in it. > > Until then I look at every single failure with a paranoid eye; could I > have prevented this? Can it be beefed up? Modernized? Should I change > these on a regular basis? > > The 63 Classic is a "modern" car in pretty much every way that matters. > With the 232 and disc brakes and modern tires it's just fine on modern > highways at 70 - 75mph with a typical load. The American however really > is a much older car, it's not a quality thing, it's just small and > "spare" in features. I got rear-ended once by a Nissan pickup in the > Classic; wrecked the rear quarter etc but safely drivable and was easily > repaired. I don't think the American would have survived that; it's just > too light and not much redundancy or extra metal. A coast to coast trip > in the American would be a small challenge; it was a no-brainer in the > Classic. It's hard to say exactly why the difference... > _______________________________________________ > Amc-list mailing list > Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx > http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list > _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list