Re: [Amc-list] Convertible conversion?

["Stu Fitchett" <amckiwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

A 64 Ambo has Ambassador in the Grill where the Classic has Rambler spelt
there so its not quite just a de chrome

Stu

-----Original Message-----
From: amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:amc-list-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, 17 December 2008 10:46 AM
To: AMC/Rambler owners, drivers and fans.
Subject: Re: [Amc-list] Convertible conversion?

That makes sense.
I did not think that the Classic was not offered in a ragtop, they had a
real time trying to keep the Ambassador and Classic seperated.  They wanted
to have people consider the Ambassador as the flagship car and it was not
really different enough to pull that off. That's why they stretched the
wheelbase in 65, Having the basier Classic available in the droptop would
have made keeping the split even harder!  They relented in 65 to the Classic
convert, I guess the differences where enough then to allow it.
  Finding a 64 Ambassador and dechroming it would be easiest way to acquire
a 64 Classic convert.  Of course, there's a LOT of holes to weld up to
dechrome a 64 Ambassador 1/4!

   The 65 got the stretched wheelbase so that would give it a whole
different vibe.
You could use a 65-66 Classic as the base, but your talking extensive
reskinning to convert to the older 64 exterior. I do think there seem to be
more 65-66 Classic converts around than 64 Ambassador converts though!

--
Mark Price
Morgantown, WV
1969 AMC Rambler, 4.0L, EFI, T-5
2004 Grand Cherokee Laredo, 4.7L, Quadratrac II
" I realize that death is inevitable.
I just don't want to be around when it happens! "

 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Sandwich Maker)
> " From: Victor the Cleaner <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> " 
> " On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 10:38:21PM +0000, Wrambler242@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> " 
> " > The only ways I would consider doing a roof to convert conversion 
> " > would be if a convert was not available in the body style I desired 
> " > or I was willing to build with a rollcage and no top!!!
> " ... 
> " > I'd look for a convert in that body as they were made, unless I am 
> " > mistaken.  Otherwise I'd consider doing it as either the rollcage 
> " > version with no top or give up.  Hopping the doors to get in and out 
> " > would grow old fast!
> " 
> " The 64 Classic is my favourite body style, and afaik it never came out
> " of the factory as a ragtop - only the Americans and Ambos (I've got a
> " 65 Ambo convertible as well).  So that's why I'm asking - I have no
> " desire to reinvent any wheels.  Perhaps someone else can correct me if
> " in fact there was a 64 Classic convertible offered.
> " 
> " And I definitely wouldn't go for the rollcage - just not the right vibe.
> 
> if a '64 classic ragtop never existed, imho you'd be best off finding
> an ambo ragtop and swapping trim, f&r clips etc.  that way you get all
> the chasis reinforcements already built in.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> Andrew Hay                                  the genius nature
> internet rambler                            is to see what all have seen
> adh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx                       and think what none thought
> _______________________________________________
> Amc-list mailing list
> Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.176 / Virus Database: 270.9.18/1852 - Release Date: 12/16/2008
6:11 PM

_______________________________________________
Amc-list mailing list
Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list