" From: David Crooks <david.crooks@xxxxxxxxxxxx> " The relationships between cam timing, duration, and rpm are reasonably " well understood, and the cold fact is that there is no one grind " that's best for both low rpm and high rpm operation. That's the whole " reason that modern high performance motors are using variable timing " on the intake and exhaust cams. Reduce the compromise, for the best " of both ranges... From Andrew Hay i wouldn't be surprised if one wouldn't want 2-dimensional control for peak efficiency, both speed and throttle as inputs to valve timing. narrow timing would be better at less than full throttle at any rpm. ________________________________________________________________________ Actually you are 100% correct, and it is done that way. In the case of the high end BMW's, there's no butterfly valve in the air intake any longer. All throttle control is done by adjusting the cam timing and lift, electronically. Do a little surfing, and you'll see that totally camless engines are being developed, to allow total and complete flexibility. Cheers, Dave -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20081119/0baa50f2/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list