> Bummer about the trans. > I kind of wonder if the light oil experiment did not cause this? Nahh, it's a HARD failure. The clutch shaft has a taper on the inside end, to hold the friction ring, making a cone. That cone was peened over from rotating jammed against the mainshaft! The friction ring (the brass thing with 5-sided teeth that does the early synchro engagement) had to be pried off. I don't really understand the failure. The snapring was a bit loose, but come on, it wasn't THAT! loose! I'm not (that kind of) idiot! Short of dropping the trans on it's nose, I don't understand how the snapring came off in the first place, or if THAT was a symptom of some weird assembly error or component problem. I assume I screwed up somewhere -- this trans operated, and fit just fine, before I started. I sure would like to know 101% what I did wrong before I stick it back in the hole. I never stressed it, didn't drop it, and it slipped right into place in the car with no forcing, and mated up flat to the bell. I didn't pull it in place with the bolts or any such foolishness. > There is mention on several different fronts about not using too light a lube in the non world class T5s as the ride on the main shaft and failure will occur. The NWC trans specs gear lube. > I've run 20W-50 mobile one and or Redline MTF in mine for years with no failure, so I don't know that is what caused your T-96 failure. If it was just bearing failure, I might think that. Once I get it fully apart, I'll see what it is exactly that's supposed to limit clutch-shaft to main-shaft contact. I assumed it was the snaprings etc at each end of the case keep 'em from bumping too hard in the middle. > We just got a salary schedule funded that was supposed to be funded in 2001 though! > I will receive an almost $2 an hour raise on October 1st, yeah! Whatsa raise?! _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list