Welp, I am armpit deep in it now. Mostly good. I did road tests to check my timing increase assumptions. For standardization I filled the gas tank, warmed it up, etc. Test was 0 - 61.6mph (3000 rpm in 3rd, tach is on the dash...) from a dead stop with OD locked out. Did a test with stock timing (10BTDC) and my crazy 25BTDC. Did three runs each. Umm, no real difference! 15.6 seconds plus minus. More runs, more consistency (that's a consolation I guess). No pinging at all. Was WOT except during shifting. I shifted about 3400 rpm and 4000 rpm, the latter to overcome the huge 2 - 3 ratio gap. I take this to mean: 36 degrees total WOT timing is not too much for this engine. Stock is 22! Maybe I would have seen some improvement with slightly less than 36 degrees advance, but it at least wasn't crazy-high, and if I make the distributor do 22 - 25 degrees centrifugal advance, I can go plus minus 5 static for adjustment range. 15 seconds to 60mph is long enough that you read a newspaper between shifts, so I got to watch the tach. Full advance comes in around 1800 - 2000 (I measured earlier), so out of that 15.6 seconds, it only spent probably 5 - 8 seconds over 2000 rpm (where it really pulls (it's all relative :-)). So any improvement from timing wouldn't probably be THAT noticable, but I think if iI ruined timing, deterioration WOULD have been. I also found I can't really do more than 20 or so degrees mechanical without the weights hitting the can, so I will drill incrementally and check. I also found that the vacuum advance unit itself limits vac adv, but it's easy to file a small lump down and get another 2 - 3 degrees from it. I did that on a junk part so I can test it separately, later (one thing at a time...) It's much more fun doing my own performance hacking than buying parts and bolting them in! Plus it appeals to Rambler Mentality... _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list