>My 70 304 has all the original head pieces and parts, except for guide seals and gaskets. >Might I be correct in saying that the additive commonly known as lead substitute doesn't really do >squat to protect the valves and seats?? >Are the lead substitute manufacturers then just pulling our legs?? Unless it's got REAL lead it's pretty much a waste of money. I'll bet your 304 is an automatic used on the street? Old engines that were used with lead tend to show less wear until a valve grind removes the lead buildup. Low RPM lightly loaded engines can get away without hard seats (depending on the mfg). At least for a while, sometimes quite a while. I had a customer who was restoring an OLD stake bed truck that had a flathead in it. He tried to get away with just using ( I believe 104 had a lead substitute) so he wouldn't have to remove the engine just for a valve grind. I can't remember how long it lasted but it wasn't more than a few months. He came in asking why his valve clearance was always closing up. He ended up yanking the engine so I could put hard seats in it. Cured the problem. Heavily loaded and /or high RPM engines run the exhaust valves MUCH hotter. Without the lead to protect them the valve tends to "pick up" pieces of the exhaust seat, leading to failure. I am currently working on a 68 396 BB Cheby engine restoration. The original seats and valves are in pretty good condition. You can actually SEE the shine of the lead still on the seats. I will be putting hard seats in it though. But hey,,, that's just ME! Bruce Hevner -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://splatter.wps.com/pipermail/amc-list/attachments/20080707/d7651dbf/attachment.htm _______________________________________________ Amc-list mailing list Amc-list@xxxxxxxxxxxx http://splatter.wps.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/amc-list